{"address":"/sx/workshop/the-paper-trilogy","as_of":"2026-09-11","blurb":"The programme's research-article track as a line of three part-constructs: the seven-campaign instrument paper (with section 6's prediction and named test), the relativity-ingress report of record (the named test in full \u2014 required for the correct continuity of the prior statements of intent), and the composition campaign paper (the dyadic bias measured). Claimed only as valid research summaries of the noted experiments and results; their SX value is wayfinding \u2014 deeper-detail anchors supporting cross-reference from the readable surface to the sealed record. The paper genre's invariants carried whole: the [R2] register, the firewall sentences, anchors cited only after live re-witness, and zero persona mention inside the bodies \u2014 the construct standing lives in the intent, the register, and the plaque, never in the papers' own text.","construct":"The Paper Trilogy \u2014 the pre-print constructs","count":7,"entries":[{"entry_id":"pt-papers-sealed","kind":"SEAL","refs":"P1 2026-07-18 + refresh 7f49e8c \u00b7 P2 sealed 7f49e8c \u00b7 P3 sealed 4a30b40 \u00b7 the anchor family index","summary":"The written history entered so the constructs can be referenced: the first paper drafted 2026-07-18 and refreshed append-only with the relativity-ingress results (the report-of-record pointer and the newest-anchor citation); the second paper sealed as the named test's report of record; the third sealed as the companion campaign's report. The cited anchors re-witnessed live at drafting; the newest package governs at any later reading.","title":"The three papers landed and sealed in the record","when":"2026-07-26"},{"entry_id":"pt-intent-sealed","kind":"SEAL","refs":"docs/ooi-paper-trilogy-construct-intent.md \u00b7 covering starl3n \u00b7 endorsement LinkDigital \u00b7 the registration rows = sheet acts on go","summary":"The section-4h precedence again: the intent seals after the papers long landed, and BEFORE the reading grant \u2014 which in this line is deliberately not given at staging: the operator asked to review the second versions first. The type declared: supporting PRE-PRINTS \u2014 the academic-research category of communication artifact. The claim bounded: valid research summaries, nothing more. The two lineages declared: 0.1 stays the submission-bound line, untouched; 0.2 = the SX pre-print line, differing only by the removed venue flagging.","title":"The trilogy's construct intent sealed \u2014 after drafting, before any grant","when":"2026-08-01"},{"entry_id":"pt-v2-staged","kind":"DRAFT","refs":"reading/staged/{horizon-first,rix-second,linearity-third}-paper-draft-0-2.md \u00b7 the review pending \u00b7 the grant not yet given","summary":"Each paper copied byte-true and given exactly the declared change: the venue flagging removed (the Australian Mathematical Society cover-note material excised; the version line restamped 0.2 saying so and nothing else). The diff of each 0.2 against its 0.1 is the checkable claim \u2014 the bodies below the cover notes are byte-identical. Staged at reading/staged/ per the section-4h lane: in-repo, hashed, ungranted, never served. THE READING GRANT AWAITS THE REVIEW: on the operator's word the three mint to the reading surface with pre-print plaques, together, in their continuity order.","title":"The three second versions staged \u2014 for the operator's review","when":"2026-08-01"},{"entry_id":"pt-review-landed","kind":"DECISION","refs":"the review word 2026-08-01 \u00b7 the sequence: first the horizon, then the second, then the third \u00b7 the links a version convenience","summary":"The operator's review of the three second versions: 'these look ok' \u2014 with the sequencing direction: each published in sequence, starting with the horizon, as a NEXT VERSION adding the relevant links to the dev.opendata.ai experiment surfaces referenced (the online-reading convenience); each later paper also referencing the readable surface of the papers before it. The assumption entered on the record with the links: a future version of the readable form will remove them as the experiments evolve beyond the step of the papers' own claims. The cover notes retained for the readable items, on his word.","title":"The review lands \u2014 the sequence and the links directed","when":"2026-08-01"},{"entry_id":"pt1-reading-granted","kind":"READING","refs":"the section-4h reading grant \u00b7 /sx/reading/horizon-first-paper","summary":"Draft 0.3 minted first: the plaque on, the cover note gaining the online-reading links (the seven-campaign instrument, its predecessor, and the named test's instrument at dev.opendata.ai; the anchored datasets at mldata) \u2014 the paper body unaltered from 0.1. Hash pinned; the pre-print type stated on the plaque.","title":"The first paper readable \u2014 the sequence opens","when":"2026-08-01"},{"entry_id":"pt2-reading-granted","kind":"READING","refs":"the section-4h reading grant \u00b7 /sx/reading/rix-second-paper \u00b7 references /sx/reading/horizon-first-paper","summary":"Draft 0.3 minted second, after the first paper's readable surface stood, so its cover note can reference it: the links to the named test's instrument, the carrier's instrument, its predecessor, the anchors \u2014 and the readable first paper. The named test's report of record, required for the correct continuity of the prior statements of intent. Hash pinned.","title":"The second paper readable \u2014 after the first stood","when":"2026-08-01"},{"entry_id":"pt3-reading-granted","kind":"READING","refs":"the section-4h reading grant \u00b7 /sx/reading/linearity-third-paper \u00b7 references the readable first and second papers","summary":"Draft 0.3 minted third, after the first and second stood: the links to the three composition instruments and the parent test's instrument, the anchors \u2014 and the readable first and second papers. The three now read in their continuity order on one surface: the first names the test, the second reports it, the third reports the companion campaign the first pre-committed. Hash pinned.","title":"The third paper readable \u2014 the trilogy stands together","when":"2026-08-01"}],"kinds":["SEAL","DRAFT","WALK","DECISION","READING"],"lifecycle":"review","slug":"the-paper-trilogy"}